Definition of design situations and combinations
The relevant design situations (DS) must be selected taking into account the circumstances under which the structure must fulfil its function. Ultimate limit state design situations are classified as follows:
- Persistent design situations, which refer to the conditions of normal use;
- Transient design situations, which refer to temporary conditions applicable to the structure, e.g., during execution or repair;
- Accidental design situations, which refer to exceptional conditions that may apply to the structure, e.g., to fire, explosion, collision, impact or the consequences of localised failure.
For a flexible dolphin structure, the following design situations (DS) and load combinations (LC) may be considered (depending on its function), also refer to Table 6-18 below:
- ULS GEO/STR - Persistent Design Situation
- Breasting/Mooring Dolphin: Ship in berth- (LC a) Design berthing scenario () with operational wind, waves and current [based on (limiting) operational environmental conditions for ship] + live loads - (LC b) Design mooring scenario () with operational wind, waves and current [based on (limiting) operational environmental conditions for ship] + live loads - Breasting/Mooring Dolphin: No ship in berth- (LC c) Design wind, wave and current conditions [50 to 100-year return period environmental conditions] + live loads- Lead-in dolphins in front of lock or bridge foundation- (LC a) Design ship impact scenario (, typically angular) + live loads - (LC c) Design wind, wave and current conditions [50 to 100-year return period environmental conditions] + live loads- Topside support dolphin (e.g. leading light)- (LC c) Design wind, wave and current conditions [50 to 100-year return period environmental conditions] + live loads, including effect of topside
- ULS GEO/STR - Transient Design Situation
- Construction of dolphin pile- Repair/maintenance of dolphin pile
- ULS GEO/STR - Accidental Design Situation
- Breasting Dolphin () - (LC d) Uncontrolled ship berthing approach impact on dolphin- Crash Barrier/Lead-in dolphin/Topside support dolphin () - (LC d) Uncontrolled ship manoeuvre leading to impact on a (crash) barrier protecting a sensitive structure, a lead-in dolphin or supporting dolphin- Mooring Dolphin () - (LC e) Bollard misuse [too many lines around bollard]- (LC e) Equipment failure on ship with 1.18 x MBL- (LC e) Ship in berth in combination with survival / very extreme weather conditions [50 to 100-year return period environmental conditions]
- SLS - Characteristic Design Situation
- Breasting/Mooring Dolphin: Ship in berth- (LC f) Characteristic berthing scenario () with operational wind, waves and current [based on (limiting) operational environmental conditions for ship] + live loads - (LC g) Characteristic mooring scenario () with operational wind, waves and current [based on (limiting) operational environmental conditions for ship] + live loads - Breasting/Mooring Dolphin: No ship in berth- (LC h) Characteristic wind, wave and current conditions [50 to 100-year return period environmental conditions] + live loads- Lead-in dolphins in front of lock or bridge foundation- (LC f) Characteristic ship impact scenario (, typically angular) with operational wind, waves and current + live loads - (LC h) Characteristic wind, wave and current conditions [50 to 100-year return period environmental conditions] + live loads- Topside support dolphin (e.g. leading light)- (LC h) Characteristic wind, wave and current conditions + live loads, including the effect of topside
Table 6-18 Breasting/Lead-in Dolphin/Crash barriers – Load Combinations
Scenario | Berthing | Mooring | No ship | |||||
Limit state (LS) Design situation (DS) | SLS Char. DS | ULS Per. DS | ULS Acc. DS | SLS Char. DS | ULS Per. DS | ULS Acc. DS | SLS Char. DS | ULS Per. DS |
Load combination (LC) | (LC f) | (LC a) | (LC d) | (LC g) | (LC b) | (LC e) | (LC h) | (LC c) |
Loads: | ||||||||
Berthing characteristic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Berthing design | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Berthing accidental | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Mooring characteristic | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Mooring design | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Mooring accidental | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Operational wave, wind, current 1) | 1.0 | γ Q | - | 1.0 | γ Q | - | - | - |
50 to 100 year RP wave, wind, current 2) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.0 | γ Q |
Live load 1) | 1.0 | γ Q | - | 1.0 | γ Q | - | 1.0 | γ Q |
Note:
1) These loads only need to be applied when having an unfavourable effect on the internal forces of the dolphin pile
2) The return period needs to be equal or higher than the design life of the structure and has a minimum of 50 years
These design situations and load combinations should be performed in combination with the following design input variables:
- Soil properties (upper and lower bound consideration of soil parameters)
- Impact level (due to multiple fenders, tidal variations, vessel loading conditions, ship range)
- Seabed level (due to scour, sedimentation, bottom protection, maintenance dredging)
- Fender (based on supplier manuals upper and lower bound fender properties considered)
Note: It is recommended to apply the corrosion allowance for the pile strength verification in combination with all other variables.
Multiple combinations of design input variables are possible. This means that , for example, a check for “pile strength” of a dolphin without fender should be performed for:
2 soil properties | (design upper & design lower) | |
2 berthing impact levels | (high & low) | |
2 seabed levels | (high & low) | |
X | ||
8 design input possibilities |
Engineering judgement may be applied to reduce the number of variable combinations. However, this should be done with care as it is difficult to predict which combination of variables will be governing for pile design.
Table 6-19 Breasting/Lead-in Dolphin/Crash barriers - Limits States (LS), Design Situations (DS), Load combinations (LC), Design Checks and Variables
Limit State | Design Situation (DS) / Load Combination (LC) | Design Check | Design variable possibilities 5) | |||
Soil | Impact | Seabed | Fender | |||
Common limit states/design situations: | ||||||
ULS – STR | Persistent Design Situation:
| Pile strength | Design upper Design lower 3) | High Low | High Low | Upper Lower |
ULS – GEO | Hor. Pile stability (100% mob) Vert. pile stability Pile displacement | Design lower | High Low | Low | Lower | |
SLS | Characteristic Design Situation:
| Pile displacement Deformation at pile toe (fixity) 1) | Char. lower | High Low | Low | Lower |
Limit states/design situations for specific conditions: | ||||||
ULS – STR/GEO | Accidental Design Situation:
| Pile strength | Design upper Design lower 3,4) | High Low | High Low | Upper Lower |
Hor. pile stability (100% mob) Vert. pile stability Pile displacement Deformation at pile toe (fixity) 2) | Design lower 3,4) | High Low | Low | Lower | ||
ULS – FAT | Mooring (cyclic lean-on) Wind, wave and currents (cyclic) | Pile strength | Char. upper Char. lower | High Low | High Low | Upper Lower |
Table 6-20 Mooring Dolphin - Limits States (LS), Design Situations (DS), Load combinations (LC), Design Checks and Variables
Limit State | Design Situation (DS) / Load Combination (LC) | Design Check | Design variable possibilities 5) | ||
Soil | Impact | Seabed | |||
Common limit states/design situations: | |||||
ULS – STR/GEO | Persistent Design Situation:
| Pile strength Pile displacement Hor. pile stability (100% mob) Vert. pile stability | Design lower | High | Low |
ULS – STR/GEO | Accidental Design Situation:
| Pile strength Hor. pile stability (100% mob) Vert. pile stability Pile displacement | Design lower 4) | High | Low |
SLS | Characteristic Design Situation:
| Pile top displacement Deformation at pile toe (fixity) 1) | Char. lower | High | Low |
Limit states/design situations for specific conditions: | |||||
ULS – FAT | Mooring (cyclic mooring line) Wind, wave and currents (cyclic) | Pile strength | Char. upper Char. lower | High Low | High Low |
Notes:
1) This check verifies that plastic soil deformation at the pile toe does not contribute to energy absorption and/or results in permanent and/or progressive pile inclination under operational loading conditions.
2) This check forces structural failure before geotechnical failure in case of accidental berthing impact scenarios in order to gain energy absorption capacity from major plastic deformations in the steel pile.
3) Contrary to many other civil structures, for energy absorbing flexible dolphins, a partial safety factor of 1.0 on soil parameters typically results in the most onerous internal forces in the pile.
4) Reduced partial safety factors on soil parameters apply (e.g. 1.0) for accidental loading scenarios.
5) Possibilities means that soil (2 variables) + impact (2 variables) + seabed (2 variables) is 2 x 2 x 2 = 8 possibilities.